Teachers’ attempts to improve assessment practice are influenced by job role and teaching experience

Hopwood-Stephens, I (2018) 'Teachers’ attempts to improve assessment practice are influenced by job role and teaching experience.' Journal of Emergent Science. ISSN 2046-4754 (Forthcoming)

Abstract

Recent changes to assessment policy in England have brought the development of primary teachers’ assessment literacy in science to the fore. The TAPS pyramid is a tool to help teachers and schools improve their assessment practice in primary science. It has been downloaded thousands of times across 45 countries, but little was known until now about its impact upon the assessment practice of the teachers using it. This report analyses quantitative data from an online survey of 96 teachers using the TAPS pyramid to show that changes in practice vary across job role and teaching experience. These differences are explored with reference to changes in national assessment policy, but also the wider international research into developing primary teachers’ assessment literacy. Finally, an argument is made for school leaders to consider the diversity in assessment literacy present among their teachers when developing primary science assessment practice.

Item Type: Article
Keywords: assessment, literacy, primary teachers, science
Subjects: L Education > LB Theory and practice of education
L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB1501 Primary Education
Divisions: Institute for Education
Date Deposited: 17 May 2018 10:57
Last Modified: 17 May 2018 10:59
References: BERA (2011) Ethical guidelines for educational research, London: British Education Research Association. Black, P., & and Harrison, C. (2004). Science inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the science classroom. London: GL Assessment. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998a). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5, 7-71. Black, P., and Wiliam, D. (2009) Developing the theory of formative assessment, Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5-31. Carter, S. A. (2015). Carter review of initial teacher training (ITT). London: Department for Education. Commission on Assessment without Levels. (2015). Final report of the commission on assessment without levels. Crown Copyright. Davies, D., Collier, C., Earle, S., Howe, A., & and McMahon, K. (2014). Approaches to science assessment in English primary schools. Primary Science Teaching Trust. Department for Education. (2014). National curriculum and assessment from 2014: Information for schools. London: Crown Copyright. Earle, S. (2017) The challenge of balancing key principles in teacher assessment. Journal of Emergent Science, 12, 41-47. Gassenheimer, C. (2013). Best practice for spreading innovation: Let the practitioners do it. Kappan Magazine, 95(3) Hargreaves, D. H. (1999). The knowledge-creating school. British Journal of Educational Studies, 47(2), 122-144. Harlen, W. (2008). Science as a key component of the primary curriculum: A rationale with policy implications. Perspectives on Education 1 (Primary Science), 4-18. Heitink, M., Van der Kleij, F., Veldkamp, B., Schildkamp, K., and Kippers, W. (2015) A systematic review of prerequisites for implementing assessment for learning in classroom practice, Educational Research Review, 17, 50-62. Hodgson, C., & and Pyle, K. (2010). A literature review of assessment for learning in science. National Foundation for Educational Research. Hodgson, C., Pyle, K., & Shamsan, Y. (2009). Assessment for learning in science: What goes on in the primary schools in england? Conference poster. AEA Europe Conference, USA. Hondrich, A., Hertel, S., Adl-Amini, K., & and Klieme, E. (2015). Implementing curriculum-embedded formative assessment in primary school science classrooms. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 23(3), 353-376. Hopwood-Stephens, I. (2017) Does dissemination mode for research make a difference for reaching in-service primary teachers? Paper presented at Teacher Education Advancement Network Conference, 11th May 2017, Aston University, Birmingham UK. Ickowitz-Seidler, L. (2017) What is happening in primary science across the UK? Guest blog post, http://www.sciencecampaign.org.uk/news-media/guest-blog/what-is-happening-in-primary-science.html, accessed 2nd February 2018. Kahl, S. (2005). Where in the world are formative tests? right under your nose! Education Week, 25(4), 11. Klenowski, V. (2009). Assessment for learning revisited: An Asia-Pacific perspective. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 16(3), 263-268. Nuffield Foundation. (2012). Developing policy, principles and practice in primary science assessment. Report from a working group led by Professor Wynne Harlen. London: Nuffield Foundation. Ofsted. (2013). Maintaining curiosity: A survey into science education in schools. Manchester: Crown Copyright. SCORE (2013) Resourcing practical science in primary schools, London: Science Community Representing Education. Serret, N., Harrison, C., Correia, C., & and Harding, J. (2017). Transforming assessment and teaching practices in science inquiry. Journal of Emergent Science, 12, 48-54. Smith, K. (2011). Professional development of teachers—A prerequisite for AfL to be successfully implemented in the classroom. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 55-61. Teacher Development Trust (2017) Twenty-one thousand teachers in school reporting no CPD budget, says TDT study, Teacher Development Trust website, accessed on 31st October 2017 at http://tdtrust.org/press-release-21000-teachers-schools-reporting-no-cpd-budget-says-teacher-development-trust-study Tymms, P., Bolden, D., & and Merrell, C. (2008). Science in english primary schools: Trends in attainment, attitudes and approaches. Perspectives on Education 1 (Primary Science), 19-41. Wellcome Trust. (2011). Primary science survey report. London: Wellcome Trust. Wellcome Trust. (2014). Primary science: Is it missing out? recommendations for reviving primary science. London: Wellcome Trust. Yamtim, V., and Wogwanich, S. (2014) A study of classroom assessment literacy of primary school teachers, Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 2998 – 3004.
Request a change to this item or report an issue Request a change to this item or report an issue
Update item (repository staff only) Update item (repository staff only)