The right to know and the right not to know revisited

Brownsword, R and Wale, J ORCID: 0000-0002-9210-029X (2017) 'The right to know and the right not to know revisited.' Asian Bioethics Review, 9 (1-2). pp. 3-18.

Preview

Text 13347.pdf - Published Version CC BY 4.0. Download (370kB) | Preview

Abstract

Prompted by developments in human genetics, a recurrent bioethical question concerns a person’s ‘right to know’ and ‘right not to know’ about genetic information held that is intrinsically related to or linked to them. In this paper, we will revisit the claimed rights in relation to two particular test cases. One concerns the rights of the 500,000 participants in UK Biobank (UKB) whose biosamples, already having been genotyped, will now be exome sequenced, and the other concerns the rights of pregnant women (and their children) who undergo non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT)—a simple blood test that can reveal genetic information about both a foetus and its mother. This two-part paper is in four principal sections. First, we sketch the relevant features of our two test cases. Secondly, we consider the significance of recent legal jurisprudence in the UK and Singapore. Thirdly, we consider how, the jurisprudence apart, the claimed rights might be grounded. Fourthly, we consider the limits on the rights. We conclude with some short remarks about the kind of genetically aware society that we might want to be and how far there is still an opportunity meaningfully to debate the claimed rights.

Item Type:	Article
Note:	This article is also available to read at the URL above.
Keywords:	right to know, right not to know, genetic information, UK Biobank, non-invasive prenatal testing
Divisions:	Bath Business School
Date Deposited:	23 Jul 2020 17:47
Last Modified:	23 Dec 2022 05:30
ISSN:	1793-8759
URI / Page ID:	https://researchspace.bathspa.ac.uk/id/eprint/13347

	Request a change to this item or report an issue
	Update item (repository staff only)