Due process in dual process: A model-recovery analysis of Smith et al. (2014)

Edmunds, C.E.R ORCID: 0000-0002-0524-8756, Wills, A.J and Fraser, M (2017) 'Due process in dual process: A model-recovery analysis of Smith et al. (2014).' Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 39. pp. 1979-1984.

Official URL: https://cogsci.mindmodeling.org/2017/papers/0379/p...

Abstract

Considerable behavioral evidence has been cited in support of the COVIS dual-system model of category learning (Ashby & Valentin, 2016). The validity of the inferences drawn from these data critically depend on the accurate identification of participants' categorization strategies. In the COVIS literature, participants' strategies are identified using a model-based analysis inspired by General Recognition Theory (Maddox, 1999). Here, we examine the accuracy of this analysis in a model-recovery simulation. We find that participants can appear to be using implicit, procedural strategies when their responses where actually generated by explicit rule-based strategies. The implications of this for the COVIS literature are discussed.

Item Type: Article
Note:

The article is available to read at the URL above.

Keywords: categorization, COVIS, dual-systems accounts, model-recovery, GRT
Divisions: School of Sciences
Date Deposited: 17 Oct 2022 13:06
Last Modified: 04 Aug 2023 05:30
ISSN: 1069-7977
URI / Page ID: https://researchspace.bathspa.ac.uk/id/eprint/15021
Request a change to this item or report an issue Request a change to this item or report an issue
Update item (repository staff only) Update item (repository staff only)