Shearer, C, Goss, H.R, Boddy, L.M, Knowles, Z.R., Durden-Myers, E.J 
ORCID: 0000-0001-7705-1138 and Foweather, L
(2021)
'Assessments related to the physical, affective and cognitive domains of physical literacy amongst children aged 7–11.9 years: a systematic review.'
Sports Medicine - Open, 7.
e37.
|
Text
15708.pdf - Published Version CC BY 4.0. Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Background:- Over the past decade, there has been increased interest amongst researchers, practitioners and policymakers in physical literacy for children and young people and the assessment of the concept within physical education (PE). This systematic review aimed to identify tools to assess physical literacy and its physical, cognitive and affective domains within children aged 7–11.9 years, and to examine the measurement properties, feasibility and elements of physical literacy assessed within each tool. Methods:- Six databases (EBSCO host platform, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus, Education Research Complete, SPORTDiscus) were searched up to 10th September 2020. Studies were included if they sampled children aged between 7 and 11.9 years, employed field-based assessments of physical literacy and/or related affective, physical or cognitive domains, reported measurement properties (quantitative) or theoretical development (qualitative), and were published in English in peer-reviewed journals. The methodological quality and measurement properties of studies and assessment tools were appraised using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments risk of bias checklist. The feasibility of each assessment was considered using a utility matrix and elements of physical literacy element were recorded using a descriptive checklist. Results:- The search strategy resulted in a total of 11467 initial results. After full text screening, 11 studies (3 assessments) related to explicit physical literacy assessments. Forty-four studies (32 assessments) were relevant to the affective domain, 31 studies (15 assessments) were relevant to the physical domain and 2 studies (2 assessments) were included within the cognitive domain. Methodological quality and reporting of measurement properties within the included studies were mixed. The Canadian Assessment of Physical Literacy-2 and the Passport For Life had evidence of acceptable measurement properties from studies of very good methodological quality and assessed a wide range of physical literacy elements. Feasibility results indicated that many tools would be suitable for a primary PE setting, though some require a level of expertise to administer and score that would require training. Conclusions:- This review has identified a number of existing assessments that could be useful in a physical literacy assessment approach within PE and provides further information to empower researchers and practitioners to make informed decisions when selecting the most appropriate assessment for their needs, purpose and context. The review indicates that researchers and tool developers should aim to improve the methodological quality and reporting of measurement properties of assessments to better inform the field.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Note: | Trial registration in PROSPERO: CRD42017062217 |
| Keywords: | physical literacy, assessment, physical education, children, systematic review |
| Divisions: | School of Education |
| Date Deposited: | 19 Sep 2023 12:19 |
| Last Modified: | 14 Jun 2024 05:30 |
| ISSN: | 2199-1170 |
| URI / Page ID: | https://researchspace.bathspa.ac.uk/id/eprint/15708 |
 |
Request a change to this item or report an issue |
 |
Update item (repository staff only) |
Tools
Tools
