‘People at the heart of our processes’, a case study of how a nursery school and children's centre promotes community cohesion

Duggan, M (2015) '‘People at the heart of our processes’, a case study of how a nursery school and children's centre promotes community cohesion.' Education 3-13: International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education. ISSN 0300-4279

6327.pdf - Accepted Version
All Rights Reserved.

Download (709kB) | Preview


This article reports on a doctoral case study of how an English integrated nursery school and children’s centre fulfils its legal duty to promote community cohesion. The provocation for the enquiry derives from the author’s growing unease over the perceived limitations of a target-driven culture currently pervading English schools. A case is made for the importance of schools’ community cohesion work; presented here as a potential vehicle with which to broaden and extend the school experience beyond the narrow individualistic confines imposed by current accountability frameworks.

Item Type: Article
Keywords: community cohesion, site of attachment, rehumanizing schools
Subjects: L Education > L Education (General)
Divisions: Institute for Education
Related URLs:
Date Deposited: 20 Jul 2015 14:51
Last Modified: 03 Jan 2017 01:40
References: 1. Amin, A. 2002. “Ethnicity and the Multicultural City.” Report for the ESCR Cities Programme and the Department of Transport, Local Government and the Regions. 2. Bailey, G., and N. Gayle. 2003. Ideology: Structuring Identities in Contemporary Life. Ontario: Broadview Press. 3. Ball, S. 1994. Educational Reform: A Critical Post-Structuralist Approach. Buckingham: Open University Press. 4. Bates, R. 2007. “Developing Capabilities and the Management of Trust.” In Amartya Sen's Capability Approach and Social Justice in Education, edited by M. Walker, and E. Unterhalter, 137–156. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 5. Baumann, Z. 2001. Community: Seeking Safety in an Insecure World. Malden: Polity Press. 6. Bowlby, J. 1953. Child Care and the Growth of Love. London: Penguin. 7. Burnett, J. 2004. “Community, Cohesion and the State.” Race and Class 45 (3): 1–18. doi: 10.1177/030639680404500301 [CrossRef], [Web of Science ®] 8. Cantle, T. 2001. Community Cohesion: A Report of the Community Cohesion Team. London: Home Office. 9. Cantle, T. 2005. Community Cohesion a New Framework for Race and Diversity. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10. Cantle, T. 2008. Parallel Lives – the Development of Community Cohesion. London: Smith Institute. 11. Castells, M. 1997. The Power of Identity. Oxford: Blackwell. 12. Ceppi, G., and M. Zini. 2003. Children, Spaces, Relations: Metaproject for an Environment for Young Children. Reggio Emilia: Municipality of Reggio Emilia. 13. Claxton, G., and M. Carr. 2004. “A Framework for Teaching Learning: the Dynamics of Disposition.” Early Years 24 (1): 87–97. doi: 10.1080/09575140320001790898 [Taylor & Francis Online] 14. Cross, S. E., and H. R. Marcus. 1994. “Self-Schemas, Possible Selves, and Competent Performance.” Journal of Educational Psychology 86 (3): 423–438. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.86.3.423 [CrossRef], [Web of Science ®] 15. Dahlberg, G., and P. Moss. 2005. Ethics and Politics in Early Childhood Education. Falmer: Routledge. [CrossRef] 16. DCSF. 2007. “Guidance on the Duty to Promote Community Cohesion.” Communities and Local Government. 17. Dyson, A., and F. Gallannaugh. 2008. “School Level Actions to Promote Community Cohesion: A Scoping Map.” Institute of Education, University of London, Technical Report, EPPI Centre. 18. Fukuyama, F. 1999. The Great Disruption: Human Nature and the Reconstitution of Social Order. London: Profile Books. 19. Gilchrist, A. 2009. The Well-connected Community a Network Approach to Community Development. Bristol: Policy Press. 20. Gorard, S. 2005. “Current Contexts for Research in Educational Leadership.” Educational Management, Adminstration and Leadership 33 (2): 155–164. doi: 10.1177/1741143205051050 [CrossRef] 21. Green, A., and J. Preston. 2001. “Education and Social Cohesion: Recentering the Debate.” Peabody Journal of Education 76 (3): 247–284. doi: 10.1207/S15327930PJE763&4_15 [CrossRef] 22. Gudykunst, W. 1995. “Anxiety/Uncertainty Management AUM Theory.” In International Communication Theory, edited by R. Wiseman, 8–58. London: Sage. 23. Gundara, J. S. 2002. Issues of Identity: Intercultural Education, Citizenship and Social Cohesion, in Runnymede Conference Cohesion, Community and Citizenship. London: Runnymede Trust. 24. Gutman, A. 1994. Multiculturalism Examining the Politics of Recognition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 25. Heath, S. B. 1983. Way with Words: Language, Life and Work in Communities and Classrooms. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. 26. Home Office. 2004. Strength in Diversity: Towards a Community Cohesion Strategy. London: Home Office. 27. Local Government Association. 2002. Guidance on Community Cohesion. London: LGA Publications. 28. Lumby, J., and M. Coleman. 2007. Leadership and Diversity. Challenging Theory and Practice in Education. London: Sage. 29. MacNaughton, G. 2005. Doing Foucault in Early Childhood Studies, Applying Poststructural Ideas. London: Routledge. [CrossRef] 30. Marsh, J. 2003. “One Way Traffic? Connections between Literary Practices at Home and in the Nursery.” British Educational Research Journal 29 (3): 369–382. doi: 10.1080/01411920301857 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] 31. Morrison, M. 2009. Leadership and Learning Matters of Social Justice. Charlotte, NC: Information Age. 32. Murphy, J. 2002. “Reculturing the Profession of Educational Leadership.” In The Educational Leadership Challenge: Redefining Leadership for the 21st Century, edited by J. Murphy, 65–82. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press. 33. Nussbaum, M. 1997. Cultivating humanity. A Classical Defence of Reform in Liberal Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 34. Nussbaum, M. C. 2000. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press. [CrossRef] 35. Nussbaum, M. 2010. Not for Profit Why Democracy needs the Humanities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 36. Ouseley, H. 2001. Community Pride not Prejudice, Making Diversity Work in Bradford. Bradford: Bradford City Council. 37. Parekh, B. 2006. Rethinking Multiculturalism Cultural Diversity and Political Theory. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 38. Peters, M. 1999. “Poststructuralism and Education.” Encylopaedia of Philosophy of Education. 39. Quicke, J. 1999. A Curriculum for Life. Buckingham: Open University Press. 40. Ramadan, T. 2010. The Quest for Meaning. London: Penguin. 41. Robinson, D. 2005. “The Search for Community Cohesion: Key Themes and Dominant Concepts of the Public Policy Agenda.” Urban Studies 42 (48): 1411–1427. doi: 10.1080/00420980500150755 [CrossRef], [Web of Science ®] 42. Sen, A. 1993. “Capability and Well Being.” In The Quality of Life: Studies in Development Economics, edited by M. Nussbaum, and A. Sen, 62–66. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [CrossRef] 43. Sommer, D., I. Pramling-Samuelsson, and K. Hundeide. 2010. Child Perspectives and Children's Perspectives in Theory and Practice. New York: Springer. [CrossRef] 44. Stone, D., and A. Colella. 1996. “A Model of Factors Affecting the Treatment of Disabled Individuals in Organizations.” Academy of Management Review 12 (2): 352–401. 45. Wenger, A. 2000. “Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems.” Organization 7 (2): 225–246. doi: 10.1177/135050840072002 [CrossRef], [Web of Science ®], [CSA] 46. Worley, C. 2005. “It's not about Race it's about the Community. New Labour and Community Cohesion.” Critical Social Policy 25: 483–496. doi: 10.1177/0261018305057026 [CrossRef], [Web of Science ®]
Request a change to this item or report an issue Request a change to this item or report an issue
Update item (repository staff only) Update item (repository staff only)