Feedback

Teacher assessment of science in English primary schools

Davies, D, McMahon, K, Howe, A, Collier, C, Digby, R and Earle, S (2015) Teacher assessment of science in English primary schools. In: ESERA2015 : 11th Biannual Conference of the European Science Education Research Association, 31 August- 4 September 2015, Helsinki, Finland.

Abstract

Teacher assessment of pupils’ on-going classroom science work can be a more valid means of judging their attainment than testing, because it can be based on a wider range of evidence; for example, observations, discussions and pupil presentations. However, questions remain regarding the reliability of teacher assessment, as they find such summative judgements difficult to make and have limited opportunities for moderation. This is of particular concern in England, where assessment of the new National Curriculum in science is entirely dependent on teacher assessment at primary level. The Teacher Assessment in Primary Science (TAPS) project aims to develop the quality and reliability of teachers’ judgements and establish a set of principles for effective assessment against which schools can evaluate their practice. It is driven by the following questions: ** What approaches are primary teachers in England currently using to assess children’s learning in science? **How valid, reliable and manageable are these approaches? **Can an approach be synthesised from elements of existing practice which embodies core principles of effective assessment? Data collected from 12 schools have included samples of assessment materials, interviews with key staff and observations of teachers making assessments during science lessons, together with school self-analyses against a theoretical framework developed from the work of Nuffield Foundation (2012), which uses the analogy of an ecosystem pyramid of numbers to represent the flow of assessment information between formative and summative purposes. Each participating teacher has also developed and piloted classroom assessment tasks, the resulting pupil work from which has been moderated between schools. Qualitative analysis of the above data sources has fed into case studies representing a typology of approaches examined against the principles of assessment embodied in the self-evaluation framework. We discuss the impact of piloting tasks on participants’ practice in recognising and making use of classroom assessment opportunities.

Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)
Additional Information:

More information available at URL above.

Keywords: early years, primary science, dialogic, creativity
Subjects: L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB1501 Primary Education
Divisions: Institute for Education
Related URLs:
Date Deposited: 08 Apr 2016 12:14
Last Modified: 08 Apr 2016 12:14
References: Alexander R. J. (2010) Children, their World, their Education Final Report and Recommendations of the Cambridge Primary Review London: Routledge Alexander, R. J. (2008) Towards Dialogic Teaching Rethinking Classroom Talk (4th Edition). Cambridge: Dialogos. Bakhtin, M. M. (1981) The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M.M. Bakhtin, Ed. Micheals Holquist, trans. Caryl Emerson and Micheal Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press. Davies, D. (2011) Teaching Science Creatively. Abingdon: Routledge Department for Education (2013) Science Programmes of study for Key Stages 1-2 http://www.education.gov.uk/schools/teachingandlearning/curriculum/nationalcurriculum2014/b00220600/consultation-national-curriculum-pos/draft-pos-subjects (accessed 28/0213) McCulloch, J. (2011) Subject to change: should primary schools structure learning around subjects or themes? London: Pearson Centre for Policy and Learning. McMahon, K. (2012) Case Studies of Interactive Whole Class Teaching in Primary Science: Communicative Approach and Pedagogic Purposes. International Journal of Science Education 34:11 1687-1708 Mortimer, E.F. and Scott, P. (2003) Making Meaning in Secondary Science Lessons. Maidenhead; Philadelphia: Open University Press. Siraj-Blatchford, I., Taggart, B. Sylva, K., Sammons, P., Melhuish, E. (2008) Towards the transformation of practice in early childhood education: the effective provision of pre?school education (EPPE) project. Cambridge Journal of Education 38:1 23-36. Siraj-Blatchford I., Sylva, K., Muttock, S., Gilden, R. and Bell, D. (2002). Researching Effective Pedagogy in the Early Years. Department of Education and Skills Research Report RR 356. Norwich: DfES. p. 24. Stake, R. (1995) The Art of Case Study Research. London: Sage. Stylianidou, F., Compton, C. Glauert, E. Craft, A., Cremin, T., Havu-Nuutinen, S. (2014) Creative Little Scientists Creativity in Science and mathematics Education for Young children: Executive summary http://www.creative-little-scientists.eu/sites/default/files/Creativity_in_Science_and_Mathematics_Education.pdf (accessed 28/01/15) Vygotsky, L.S. (1978) Mind in Society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Request a change to this item or report an issue Request a change to this item or report an issue
Update item (repository staff only) Update item (repository staff only)