What spelling errors can tell us about the development of processes involved in children’s spelling

Niolaki, G.Z, Negoita, A, Vousden, J.I, Terzopoulos, A.R, Taylor, L and Masterson, J (2023) 'What spelling errors can tell us about the development of processes involved in children’s spelling.' Frontiers in Psychology, 14. e1178427. ISSN 1664-1078

15351.pdf - Published Version
CC BY 4.0.

Download (486kB) | Preview
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1178427


Introduction: Spelling is an essential foundation for reading and writing. However, many children leave school with spelling difficulties. By understanding the processes children use when they spell, we can intervene with appropriate instruction tailored to their needs. Methods: Our study aimed to identify key processes (lexical-semantic and phonological) by using a spelling assessment that distinguishes different printed letter strings/word types (regular and irregular words, and pseudowords). Misspellings in the test from 641 pupils in Reception Year to Year 6 were scored using alternatives to binary correct versus incorrect scoring systems. The measures looked at phonological plausibility, phoneme representations and letter distance. These have been used successfully in the past but not with a spelling test that distinguishes irregularly spelled words from regular words and pseudowords. Results: The findings suggest that children in primary school rely on both lexical-semantic and phonological processes to spell all types of letter string, but this varies depending on the level of spelling experience (younger Foundation/Key stage 1 and older Key stage 2). Although children in younger year groups seemed to rely more on phonics, based on the strongest correlation coefficients for all word types, with further spelling experience, lexical processes seemed to be more evident, depending on the type of word examined. Discussion: The findings have implications for the way we teach and assess spelling and could prove to be valuable for educators.

Item Type: Article
Keywords: spelling, phonological plausibility, letter distance, automated measures of phonemes representations, primary age students
Divisions: School of Education
Research Centres and Groups: Centre for Research in Equity, Inclusion and Community (CREIC)
Research Centre on Policy, Pedagogy and Practice in Education (PPP)
Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1178427
Date Deposited: 12 May 2023 17:25
Last Modified: 09 Jun 2023 17:35
URI / Page ID: https://researchspace.bathspa.ac.uk/id/eprint/15351
Request a change to this item or report an issue Request a change to this item or report an issue
Update item (repository staff only) Update item (repository staff only)