Koot, S, Anyango‐van Zwieten, N, Sullivan, S, Dressler, W, Spierenburg, M, Trogisch, L, Marijnen, E, Fletcher, R, Rakhmani, I, Abdulwahab Afiff, S, Benjaminsen, T.A, Milne, S, Svarstad, H, Büscher, B, Dutta, A, Lowe, C and Rai, N.D. (2025) 'Intimidation as epistemological violence against social science conservation research.' Conservation Biology, 39 (2). e14454.
Preview |
Text
16992.pdf - Published Version CC BY-NC.ND 4.0. Download (217kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We investigated intimidation of conservation social scientists, which is ongoing and aimed at silencing or discrediting research findings. Although social scientists share with conservation biologists the desire to understand and address the biodiversity crisis, their analysis of structural power relations and contradictions in conservation is sometimes not appreciated. Intimidation can take place before and during fieldwork, during the publication process, and after publication in academic and public spheres. We examined our diverse experiences of intimidation, including legal threats, character assassination, physical threats, job exclusion, and curtailment of academic freedom. Diverse actors, including national research granting bodies, international policy makers, donors, ethics bodies, and conservation biologists and organizations, may target research that does not align with their political, economic, financial, and ideological interests. We refer to intimidating practices to suppress or alter unwelcome perspectives or research findings as epistemological violence. Tactics of epistemological violence relate to structural, systemic, symbolic, discursive, and material violence and have significant implications for understanding and improving long-term conservation. Epistemological violence can impede the progress, effectiveness, and social justness of conservation and suppress critical or differently informed perspectives crucial for a well-functioning academia. Intimidation hampers crucial collaborations among disciplines and with societal partners. Epistemological violence has detrimental consequences for affected individuals, the broader conservation community, people living in or near conservation areas, and conservation achievements.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Keywords: | conservation, epistemological violence, fieldwork, intimidation, publication, qualitative methods, social science, research |
| Divisions: | School of Writing, Publishing and the Humanities |
| Date Deposited: | 03 Apr 2025 13:59 |
| Last Modified: | 11 Apr 2025 11:06 |
| ISSN: | 0888-8892 |
| URI / Page ID: | https://researchspace.bathspa.ac.uk/id/eprint/16992 |
 |
Request a change to this item or report an issue |
 |
Update item (repository staff only) |
Tools
Tools
